Reviews of the Book Were Doomed Now What
See a Problem?
Thanks for telling us nigh the problem.
Friend Reviews
Customs Reviews
It begins with a series of perceptive essays on the environment. "We need to learn to permit our current civilization die, to accept our bloodshed and practice humility," he says. He visits Greenland where he finds information technology is losing about 300 billion tons of ice every year. This alone will raise body of water levels more than 20 anxiety. "Nosotros detect ourselves less than human, lacking even the dumb instinct for survival nosotros see in the way plants will bend toward the sun."
Those first essays are powerful. But from there, things get confusing. Scranton spends over a hundred pages reliving his army stint in Republic of iraq, and revisits, on behalf of Rolling Rock, to notice how corrupt and messed up their elections are. He then pivots to the Soviet Marriage and how much it sacrificed in World War Ii, and so to Seymour Hersh's article claiming the Osama Bin Laden trackdown was a fraud. He also draws parallels and connections betwixt police shooting blacks and American wars and warriors. You lot might discover the book on the environment and climate alter has completely disappeared.
So despite the title, this is not a book on the environment. It is a cathartic drove of disparate essays from 2010-1018, demonstrating Scranton's erudition and ability to research. Simply everything is suffused with soldiering and war. He blames the USA for Iraq and Transitional islamic state of afghanistan'south "ongoing homo suffering almost incomprehensible in its meaninglessness. " At times it is profound, simply it is ofttimes PTSD on display.
David Wineberg
...more
I had a certain admiration for Roy Scranton based on his previous manifesto, Learning to Die in the Ant
[I wrote this in May after finishing the volume, then I decided that I sounded intemperate, so I took down the review. But I only read Jonathan Safran Foer disagree with Scranton on the same betoken in We Are the Atmospheric condition, so I'll put my review back up. Foer doesn't say he hates Scranton like I practise, of class, and he's more clear in his critique than I was. This was just my immediate response:]]I had a certain adoration for Roy Scranton based on his previous manifesto, Learning to Die in the Anthropocene. I thought it was challenging and surprising, tough-minded. Now I basically detest him. He comes beyond as angry, pretentious, self-serving and cocky-aggrandizing. I especially despised the discussion in which he pretends to consider - purely, it turns out, for rhetorical consequence - the recognized means that starting time-globe humans can better climatic change, and so he glibly explains why he tin't exercise them: consume a plant-based nutrition (it makes him feel weak and cranky!); don't wing (only he has friends all over the country, and he'due south a rock-star writer!); downsize to one car per family unit and/or use public transportation (he can't because, you know: work, and friends, and a lifestyle to maintain, not to mention all those annoying strangers!); don't accept kids, or have one fewer child (merely information technology's the human imperative and he actually wanted to have a child, and it's his correct!). He then says that none of that will do any good and they're just kind of hard for him - so he will choose to participate in life fully, which means eating factory-farmed meat and driving and flying (he actually says all this) and let his girl bargain with the consequences afterward. This is all followed by some terrible attempts at nature imagery. Now I see Scranton's imperative to "acquire how to die in the Anthropocene" in a new light - he means suck information technology up and give in - nosotros accept fucked it all upwardly anyway. But enjoy yourself while yous're here. Just don't get in the way of Roy Scranton and his family.
...more
I expect forward to an writer that can assist guide people (readers) to a life that lives on the edges of our electric current society not just in protest but an case of how we can live differently and happily while doing less harm to the but planet we have to live on.
...more
This volume was worthwhile, but uneven, and the c
"The greatest peril in life lies in the fact that human food consists entirely of souls," an Inuk named Invaluardjuk told Danish anthropologist Knud Rasmussen a century ago. "All the creatures that we have to kill and eat, all those that we have to strike downwards and destroy to make apparel for ourselves, have souls, like we have, souls that practice not perish with the body, and which must therefore be propitiated lest they should revenge themselves on us."This volume was worthwhile, only uneven, and the last slice, "Raising a Girl in a Doomed World" is one-half-baked and fuzzy-headed to such an extent that it practically undermines everything else in the book. He writes, "As for not having a child, of course nobody needs to have children. It just happens to be the strongest drive humans accept, the fundamental organizing principle of every human being culture and the sine qua non of a meaningful human world, since it solitary makes possible the persistence of man meaning through time. My partner and I didn't need to have a child, but without 1, our lives felt similar they lacked something important." This passage--like most of the essay--is weakly justifying and rationalizing, and more than importantly not truthful. Lots of people do not feel that drive. They have other, stronger ones. And every bit an organizing principle of culture, it's been pretty evil and oppressive to the earth, not-man life, and especially human women. Plus, there are at least a 1000 other means for meaning to persist through time than simply reproducing one'southward human DNA and sending it forwards into the future.
...more
(I read only the sections on climate change; the sections on war and violence I skimmed, but likewise quickly to annotate on it)
I'm giving upwardly on Roy Scranton.
He writes beautifully. It's lyrical and well-constructed. Even so, if this volume were written past a woman, it would be called histrionic. These essays are beautifully written explorations of Scranton'south feelings of doom, and a select few ruby-picked facts to support that feeling, all cobbled together with duct tape and chicken
**95th Climate Volume**(I read merely the sections on climatic change; the sections on war and violence I skimmed, only too speedily to annotate on it)
I'm giving upwards on Roy Scranton.
He writes beautifully. It's lyrical and well-constructed. However, if this volume were written past a woman, information technology would exist called histrionic. These essays are beautifully written explorations of Scranton's feelings of doom, and a select few ruby-picked facts to support that feeling, all cobbled together with duct record and chicken wire to support a plan of inaction.
Example 1: Repeated statements that "nosotros have already exceeded i.5C above pre-industrial temperatures." Except that we haven't, and then what is he talking about? He is talking about specific months that have exceeded one.5C. Yous can't compare a specific month with a pre-industrial average of all seasons! Our current average exceedance is effectually 1C, which is very bad, and we're likely to get to 1.5C onetime this century--we certainly will if we don't act strenuously. But this ... error? oversight? ... is significant, considering the 1.5C threshold is the "civilization falls apart" threshold.
Case 2: Later, in an essay that I think is virtually the anthropocene as a term only also borderline breathless, he engaged in an extended defence of an early 20th century scientist with a history of scientific hoaxes named Chambers because he gave a talk in 1945 with "anthropocene" in the title. He as well describes an experiment conducted in the 1920s by Chambers, in which he hired oilmen to drill into the earth's chaff and then he could fire a gun into information technology, to test his theory that the earth was a living organism (seems right in line with earlier 'gentlemen-naturalists' who would go on voyages to 'unexplored' locations and think, "What a pretty bird! Permit me kill a agglomeration of them and so I tin have them home and sell them to museums!" and ended up driving these treasured species to extinction). The experiment ended in an explosion and three deaths, but, says Scranton, what if this proves that Chambers was right and the earth killed them in self-defence force? (!!!) His prove? Diary entries on the result from Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, author and stiff believer in the paranormal. Not that Doyle's biases are mentioned in Scranton'south text.
The entire book is a confusion of his feelings with facts. He feels doomed; therefore, we are doomed; he feels action is pointless; therefore, in that location is no point; hither are some carefully selected part-facts in back up of those feelings; the residual of the facts are swept under the carpet; he then performs lyrical acrobats on top of the rug-lumps in an endeavor to flatten them/distract readers; and so he cries. He does not need book contracts. He needs therapy.
...more
Dissimilar books by Michael Klare or others who write well-nigh resources wars, Scranton's book says little (not nothing, but little) about how climatic change has or could lead to wars. And nothing at al
The title and encompass of the paperback do this volume a disservice. Perhaps the author had little or no say and the publisher thought it would sell better to packet a book of essays largely fatigued on the author'southward experiences serving in the US Army in Republic of iraq during wartime every bit a volume about climate change and war.Dissimilar books by Michael Klare or others who write about resource wars, Scranton's book says trivial (not nothing, simply little) most how climate change has or could pb to wars. And nothing at all matching the embrace image of a get-go-world metropolis actualization to be swamped past storms from sea-level rise.
Indeed, essays at the beginning and end are about climate change and merge some thoughtful perspectives from both the writer's ain experience and his readings in literature and critical theory. I understand it'due south a drove of essays. Just the chapters often seem to have petty in common except the author's name.
Readers who are military veterans may peculiarly appreciate Scranton's word of controversies inside the veterans-lit customs of writers, though I started to lose the thread at times. More interesting for me as a general reader were his insights on the psychology of soldiers at state of war and in peacetime and how that psychology connects to bigger trends in American civilization.
...more
The first essay felt like the writer was channeling David Foster Wallace at his most incoherently esoteric. I almost gave upward only one of the beauties of essays is you motility on to the adjacent.
I liked about of the rest of the essays though there were some irksome spots so wearisome I've already forgotten why.
I liked his state of war essays especially perspective of existence in the military in Iraq and what he learned. Similar some of my contemporaries who experienced Vietnam he came out with two.5 stars. Audiobook. Reader okay.
The first essay felt like the writer was channeling David Foster Wallace at his nearly incoherently esoteric. I almost gave up but one of the beauties of essays is you motion on to the adjacent.
I liked most of the rest of the essays though at that place were some dull spots then dull I've already forgotten why.
I liked his war essays especially perspective of being in the armed forces in Iraq and what he learned. Like some of my contemporaries who experienced Vietnam he came out with problems to bargain with and a very different view. He too aptly pointed out how the U.Due south. has long been a country with a culture of trouble solving by violence both domestically and internationally.
The final essay had some annoying features by and large considering it seemed similar an apology for not making changes because they are hard and at present he has a child so needs to cling to the flush heart class lifestyle nosotros are so addicted to in the west particularly the US.
I ended upward feeling as though we will careen into devastation. Everyday we seem to be moving closer as those who strive for change are outnumbered and outweighed by those who either deny what is going on just care about getting what they want at the expense of others. I'm old so I don't call back I will be here for the concluding extinction but I won't surrender trying to live with less impact and some mindfulness as I have for the last 45 years. ...more
There are better books describing the futility of hope in the Anthropocene, and why. Embrace the nihilism and enjoy what time you lot accept on Gaia. Nothing volition salvage humanity from the grim future it has wrought, but if delusions are your candy, eat them up with mindless glee.
...more
I thought those essays were quite potent, simply my progress bogged to a halt during the lengthy department about war (specifically, Iraq). Information technology wasn't bad, just very long, and frankly disinterested me to the point where it was a chore to slog through.
Then it veered into literary criticism, which was surprising, but really quite skillful. "The Trauma Hero" in partic
Really not what I expected from the championship. As other reviewers note, the environmental/global warming content is only the first 80 or so pages.I idea those essays were quite strong, but my progress bogged to a halt during the lengthy section nearly state of war (specifically, Republic of iraq). It wasn't bad, just very long, and frankly disinterested me to the indicate where it was a chore to slog through.
Then it veered into literary criticism, which was surprising, but actually quite good. "The Trauma Hero" in particular was a very strong critique of "the soldier" and gave me number of additional works to check out.
I also appreciated the final ii pieces which felt decidedly more personal. The dissection of endless content overload in "What is Thinking Good For?" was extremely poignant. It covered so many things I've thought virtually modern thought, opinion, and how we "understand" in the internet historic period.
I'll admit this was not an like shooting fish in a barrel read as Scranton drops lots of names and can get quite academic, but I'm glad I stuck it out. Now to get back to more than timely reading...
...more
"The situation [...] is more than dire than whatsoever other moment in human history, and we only cannot wait until we become perfect bodhisattvas or perfect environmentalists earlier we respond. We must act now, as flawed, failed, flailing selve
In a drove of riveting, arresting essays on "the breakup of the post-1945 global order, a multispecies mass extinction, and the outset of the end of civilization as nosotros know it," Roy Scranton lays blank the horrific juncture at which our species finds itself."The state of affairs [...] is more dire than any other moment in homo history, and we only cannot wait until we become perfect bodhisattvas or perfect environmentalists before we reply. We must act now, equally flawed, failed, flailing selves. At the same fourth dimension, the situation we discover ourselves in is across our power to change. The planet volition get warmer. The ice caps volition melt. The seas will rise. The global, fossil-fueled, consumer capitalist civilization nosotros live in volition come to an end."
But this isn't but a tract on climate alter, or a factual examination of "the human species equally a geological forcefulness," it'south a hard cold await at human nature, the types of culture and civilization we build, and more specifically a searching inventory of the heart of the American experience in these latter years. Scranton doesn't claim any scientific laureates or keen seat of expertise, yet he seems more capable of assembling and analyzing data, constructing solid arguments, and weaving them into highly personalized narratives:
"I'm not a climate scientist. I'm not a Benjamin scholar. I'thousand not a professional philosopher. I'chiliad a novelist and old journalist and an essayist. My scholarly training is in twentieth-century American literature, poetics, and intellectual history. My tools are historicism and close reading and dialectics and narrative, images and rhetoric and concepts. So what do I do? What do we practice? What tin mere words practice for a doomed civilisation?
The range of action seems narrow, and nigh ineffectual. Alerting people to the trouble and educating wide audiences has proven ineffective against deliberately sown confusion, deep scientific ignorance, widespread apathy, and outright hostility."
A central concept of Scranton's thesis is "the idea of the Anthropocene [epoch]," a proposed geological epoch which charts the era of our species' impact on Earth's geology and ecosystems:
"In the middle of the twentieth century, Homo sapiens sapiens began to shape the geological processes of the Earth so profoundly that information technology inadvertently transformed the global cycles of warming and heating caused past the planet'south orbit around the sunday, and will go on to exercise and so for a hundred thousand years or more than, in ways that will be readable in the geological record millions of years in the futurity. No ane intended this, and we seem to be incapable of preventing information technology. This is the deep meaning of the Anthropocene, the meaning we tin can normally only look at in flashes, peeking betwixt primate fingers."
He has reason to be alarmed and alarmist:
"In the virtually eighty years since [1940], the human species has outburst the purlieus conditions for sustainable life on Earth through what some scientists phone call the 'Great Acceleration,' an unprecedented spike in socioeconomic and earth systems trends - everything from carbon dioxide emissions, surface temperatures, and tropical woods loss to fertilizer consumption, water apply, and population (from approximately 2.three billion in 1940 to 7.6 billion today)."
Scranton has honed his writing skills through years of frontline experience working his strange and storied way through the backroads and odd jobs of America, dropping out and re-enrolling and declining out of college; working as a short-lodge cook; a time in various causes and protest movements; random journeys intended as sources for literary provender but proving to be more bruising and real than mayhap intended; a harrowing 4 yr term in the military. His prose reflects the brutal feel of endless drafts, relentless rewrites, and countless unpublished works, along with a deep cogitating imagination and a wistful mind:
"The motivating enigma of the Anthropocene is the man as echinoderm, a geological agent, mortal flesh as immortal stone. Over eons, starfish and sea urchin skeletons recompose into limestone, but as stegosaurus recomposes into Brent crude, becoming geology: nosotros have non only joined the ranks of such geoforms, but surpassed them. The planet as a whole is one giant, heaving, nature-auto made of countless smaller nature-machines, itself participating in an even larger solar nature-auto, 1 part of the Milky way milky way nature-automobile, itself a tiny function of the universe nature-machine, which may itself be simply a tiny piece of the multiverse nature-car. Nosotros don't know how it all works. We don't know whether it has a commencement or an finish, or whether information technology just keeps pumping, infinitely, expanding and contracting, an eternally beating god-heart, a nature-machine that builds itself for itself, for no reason, for nothing, meaning nothing, a howling wilderness car, wolves all the mode downwards."
What a masterful paragraph, winding up the intensity to end on that crazy phrase, "wolves all the mode downwards." Yous feel like you're in the hands of a primary wordsmith while reading this book.
From climate and the future of our civilization, Scranton pivots to a treatise on America's bloody history:
"Hadn't I read almost the campaigns against the Cherokee, Nez Percé, and Sioux, the long state of war against Philippine independence, and the horrors of Vietnam? My granddaddy served on a Swift Gunkhole in the Mekong Delta, thought he never talked about it; hadn't trying to fill up in his silence taught me almost fee-fire zones, My Lai, and hospitals total of napalmed orphans? The encarmine track of American history, from slavery to genocide to empire, is plain for all to see. Merely reckoning with the violence itself was the appeal: I idea I could confront our dark side, simply like Luke Skywalker, and come away enlightened."
But there was no redemptive enlightenment waiting awaiting him on the streets of Baghdad, just carnage and confusion, and seeds of doubt that would abound thick and thorny, bitter and piercing, as the years passed.
"Looking out over Baghdad on the Fourth of July, I saw the truth that story obscured and inverted: I was the faceless storm trooper, and the scrappy rebels were the Iraqis.
Did information technology actually take going to Baghdad to learn this?"
Scranton'due south searing gaze carries a different weight than, say, a pacifist scientist or an anti-state of war protestor, because after years of failed literary pursuits and haphazard living, the events of 9/11 crystallized into a determination to enlist. Scranton approaches the state of war not as an outsider disquisitional of its intents or aims, or as some sanctimonious politician waving the blunt flag of patriotism, but equally human being who served a year in Iraq and who besides had the capacity to seek any grand strategy underpinned the entire effort. What he began to see there was troubling:
"Later on Fallujah fell, though, I establish myself commencement to remember that either nosotros hadn't, in fact, done our job, or that the job we'd actually been sent to do was so reprehensible that even if nosotros were successful, there was no way I'd want to merits it. What if the US military hadn't been sent to Iraq to create a democracy, stabilize a failed country, or fifty-fifty plant a bastion of secular commercialism in the Middle Eastward, as we'd been repeatedly told, merely rather to oversee the sectarian division of a sovereign nation, install a weak authoritarian ruler whose regime would be justified by advisedly phase-managed elections, and turn Iraq into a cockpit for regional sectarian and political bloodletting? What if the main US interest wasn't regional stability just rather regional instability, with just enough infrastructure in place to keep oil flowing out and American-fabricated weapons flowing in? This was undoubtedly what The states policy had accomplished, through countless deliberate decisions over many years, and what if information technology hadn't been a mistaken - what if it had been intentional?"
He had been hoping to exist able to accept some narrative that Americans were the peacemakers and nation builders he had understood them to be from his history lessons, from his knowledge of the recent past. He had "naively supposed" that later victory in Iraq "things would settle downwards" and "gainsay missions would transition to stability-and-back up operations" and "re-building."
"Nosotros would move out into the communities. The United states occupations in Frg, Japan, and Korea were the most prominent examples I had of how it might have worked, only the more recent American armed services intervention in the Balkans seemed a plausible model as well. These operations were all within living memory and connected to have material, concrete historical existence."
But it "wasn't as simple as all that." In a powerful summation of the American Century seen through the eyes and felt through the flesh of an individual American soldier, Scranton ruminates that "the past doesn't fall away simply lives on in your flesh, in your habits, in the synaptic weave that makes consciousness out of electrical pulses and meat." While he left Iraq in 2004 and served two more years in the army, the "twelvemonth in Iraq made me who I became after, every bit did my four years in the army, no thing how I felt nigh it." And similarly, the eight years of US occupation of Iraq "shaped what America is, whether we want to retrieve those years or not." Information technology'due south quite a retentiveness lane.
"Shock and Awe, WMDs, Abu Ghraib, Haditha, abandoned soccer fields, Fallujah, Tal Afar, Karbala, Asaib Ahl-al-Haq, the Jaish al-Mahdi, the Green Zone, Sadr City, Shah, the Imam Ali mosque in Najaf, the Samarra mosque, al Qaeda in Republic of iraq, and the millions of lives we uprooted, left unguarded, destroyed, and abandoned are all a function of the states at present. We made them part of America, American identity and American history - Republic of iraq has become flesh of our flesh, Baghdad blood of our blood. We tin can pretend to forget, try to rub out the image in the mirror, just nosotros tin't change what we've done."
Scranton recounts his frustrated re-entry into American society, fuming at the adolescent men playing kick-ball in McCarren Park in Williamsburg, a symbol for all the absent-minded carelessness of a nation bent on blind environmental devastation, living on the spoils of America's bloody march to empire. For a time he flirts with the anti-war protest movement, but even in that location he finds no domicile.
"All the same I marched with them. We walked up Park Artery and down Lexington to the United Nations, where people had set up tables at Dag Hammerskjöld Plaza. It was a prissy walk on a beautiful day, and past the time we got to the finish, I was ill of it, sick of the sanctimonious practice-gooders cheering on the sidelines and their empty slogans, sick of how many different issues were piggy-backing on my war, from legalizing marijuana to freeing Tibet, and sick of talking to Jen and José, who had no right to call themselves 'Republic of iraq and Transitional islamic state of afghanistan Veterans.'"
Unable to truly connect with the chaotic jumbled rabble of the protestors, he recalls an earlier protest that taught him harsh lessons most how easily such demonstrations and movements were shut downwards, contained, neutralized:
"We were stymied from the start. The first trouble was that our 'free speech zone' was nowhere well-nigh the auditorium where Bush was speaking - you could nearly see it over at that place, a half mile or then away, well by the constabulary and fences. The second trouble was that the constabulary had us well in paw. Nosotros were common cold, moisture, and disorganized; they had horses, anarchism gear, and a plan. They kept united states cordoned in a small rectangle nigh an intersection, and our docility in being herded was as notable as our agitation in chanting 'Democracy!'"
Scranton is a stranger in a strange land, unable even to find evidence that "serious thought" has any value in our modern historic period.
"It sometimes seems as if the merely socially valued forms of intellectual labor are the production of ideology ('remember tanks'), the production of attending ('recall pieces'), and the production of reproducible consumer objects (i.east., books, non necessarily for reading only for discussing, ideally big books with simple arguments that can exist repeated ad nauseam across multiple platforms - call up Steven Pinker or Malcolm Gladwell). Producing noesis about the globe is still compensated, if not as well equally producing opinions, merely when it comes to serious thought the situation seems dour. Yes, 'critical thinking' is still spoken of equally a value in the humanities wing of the educational industry, even thought it's nether profound assault across the civilization and fifty-fifty if critique has by and large devolved into a gear up of rote gestures, but the backbreaking liberation of consciousness from dogma and self-imposed ignorance is as unwelcome today as it was in Socrates's Athens. And even if you lot do find solid journalism, beautiful writing, profound analysis, or edifying thought, what practise you practise with it? Read it, tweet it, so move on to the side by side, and the next, and the side by side? A stream of language passes into you through a screen then back out through another screen, and tin you even say information technology touched y'all? Were you even there? Or was information technology just a monetary shudder of the hive?"
For all that, like Yeats in his later poem "Circus Animals Desertion," where he laments the gradual decline of his concrete form and the fading of inspiration yet still produces a work of devastating genius in the center of his lament, Scranton has produced a work of intensely serious thought, couched in beautiful writing and profound analysis. A pre-eulogy to the Anthropocene.
...more
"In a few figures in every age, biography and history merge, and every bit a shadow fell across Europe in 1940, Benjamin wrote his "Theses on the Philosophy
Confession time. I didn't actually read Roy Scranton'due south drove of essays, "We're Doomed. Now What?" I red-picked some of the essays. Mostly the environmental ones. I'one thousand just not interested in his musings on war (every bit beautifully written equally they are). But what I read was bleak, compelling, and deeply moving. I volition let parts of it speak for itself."In a few figures in every age, biography and history merge, and equally a shadow vicious across Europe in 1940, Benjamin wrote his "Theses on the Philosophy of History," offer the enduring image of Paul Klee's Angelus Novus as the angel of history, wings spread and mouth agape, being blown astern into the future: 'Where nosotros perceive a chain of events, he sees one unmarried catastrophe which keeps piling wreckage upon wreckage and hurls it in front of his feet. The angel would like to stay, awaken the dead, and brand whole what has been smashed. Merely a storm is blowing from Paradise; it has got caught in his wings with such violence that the angel can no longer close them ... This storm is what we telephone call progress.'" (Pp. 74-75)
"It sometimes seems as if the just socially valued forms of intellectual labor are the product of ideology ('think tanks'), the production of attending ('think pieces'), and the production of reproducible consumer objects (i.e., books, not necessarily for reading merely for discussing, ideally big books with simple arguments that tin be repeated advertising nausea across multiple platforms—think Steven Pinker or Malcolm Gladwell)." (Pp. 308)
"What is thinking good for today, among the millions of voices shouting to be heard, as we stumble and trip toward our doom? Not much, perchance nothing, peradventure less. Certainly retentivity can assistance preserve the wisdom of the by and set the record straight, understanding tin can assistance us encounter our state of affairs more clearly, and the two together can help us brand sense of how we got to where we are. Questioning our accepted beliefs tin can reveal to united states our subconscious selves. Cultivating an awareness of our dependence on others, man and not-human being alike, opens the mode to compassion, humility, and joyful communion with all existence. Practicing detachment vitiates want an accommodates our souls to death. And finally, ultimately, deliberation slows and limits action. Pondering your situation keeps y'all from reacting to it, which is, in the end, the highest good thought can offer: doing less, doing nothing, existence nix more or less than we are—a gathering of grit and light, a universe—awake."
"The choice nosotros take to make isn't whether or how to salvage ourselves just, equally I said before, whether we're willing to commit to living ethically in a cleaved world, in which human beings are dependent for commonage survival on respecting the ecological limits of our planet.... Showtime, we should organize locally and aggressively. This will non merely connect u.s. to our neighbors, but it'south also the virtually probable path to world socialist revolution....Second, and mayhap counter-intuitively, we need to do less....then much of what we do is unnecessary, unconsidered, and reactive that we live out our days distracted and drained and unfocused. Slow down. Practice less. DO the one matter that matters, rather than the 15 that don't.... Finally nosotros need to acquire to die.... this self we cling to and then fiercely is but an ephemeral moment, a transient emergence of self-witting affair, a passing cloud of being." (pp. 333-iv)
...more
"Hopelessness is the limit and offset of a new kind of promise. You have to keep going: non to accomplish dreams of cute mount acme forests, but because life is more powerful than death. Hopelessness makes possibl
We demand to learn to allow our current culture die, to accept our mortality, and to practice humility. We demand to work together to transform a global lodge of significant focused on accumulation into a new lodge of meaning that knows the value of limits, transience, and restraint. (8)"Hopelessness is the limit and beginning of a new kind of hope. You have to keep going: non to achieve dreams of beautiful mountain pinnacle forests, but because life is more powerful than death. Hopelessness makes possible a new promise that is more pocket-sized, organized religion in the basic tissue of life that is stronger than whatever disaster. This is how humanity survives. This is the force that keeps us going." (Quoting Naseer Hassan, a 52-year-sometime Iraqi poet on pp. 148-ix)
Scranton's Buddhist philosophy shines here, peculiarly in the "At present What?" aspects of his climate essays. (Live at present, alive less, and live consciously and humbly, BTW.) This is non standard apocalyptic climatic change fare, merely realistic, woke reflections that, while long on generalizations and brusk on specifics (the nature of the beast?), offer a path of hope and perchance peace in the chaos of our futurity. The essays at the beginning and end were worth the whole volume, although the essays on war as trauma were as well insightful - and helpful.
Scranton does not connect climate change and war in the way I had thought he would, afterward I heard him connect the two in a Climate One articulation interview with Matthew Fox (http://www.matthewfox.org/latest-talks/). This collection of essays spanning x years or then seemed more disjointed, just far more than hopeful - which is quite an accomplishment, given the dire discipline matter.
...more 
The problem is that it is hyperbole, non science. He appears more interested in making a proper name for himself through yellow journalism (yes, I realize that is a term no longer used since all news had become stance) than learning or sharing the facts.
His research
This is a poorly written outlook past a inexperienced journalist (and I apply that discussion lightly.) Scranton apparently got "woke" by taking a ecotourism trip to view glaciers and came back set on changing the world to concord with his earth view.The problem is that it is hyperbole, non science. He appears more interested in making a name for himself through yellow journalism (yes, I realize that is a term no longer used since all news had become stance) than learning or sharing the facts.
His research is sophomoric and/or anecdotal. Motion along - zilch to see here.
...more 
And have it from a vegan who lifts, bro. A plant-based diet doesn't make y'all cranky—being an asshole does.
Fabricated me think back to my days equally a Rhetoric major at UC Berkeley. Mr. Scranton's essays are not thought provoking. They are challenging reason itself. Must read once again more closely. Demand to become dorsum and read again Plato and the residuum. Thank you lot Mr. Scranton.
His essay "Learning How to Dice in the Anthropocene" was selected for the 2015 Best American Scientific discipline and Nature Writing, he was a post-doctoral research young man at the Heart for Energy and Environmental Inquiry in the Man Sciences at Rice University, and he has been awarded a Whiting Fellowship in the Humanities, likewise as a Lannan Literary Fellowship for Fiction.
...moreNews & Interviews
Welcome back. Just a moment while nosotros sign you in to your Goodreads account.
Source: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/36616163-we-re-doomed-now-what
Post a Comment for "Reviews of the Book Were Doomed Now What"